Be ready before care.
Assemble referral evidence, check eligibility and authorization requirements, and surface missing documentation. Proposed supervised pilot scope.
AI-ENABLED REVENUE CYCLE MANAGEMENT
A more reliable operating layer for specialty-clinic revenue.
Connect clinical documentation, payer requirements, coding checks and staff decisions in an evidence-driven workflow designed to reduce avoidable rework.
Evidence first. Versioned rules. People accountable.
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW 01—04
01 / SOURCEClinical evidenceNotes · orders · performed services
↓
02 / CHECKVersioned rulesEvidence, payer requirements, coding
03 / REVIEWQualified human reviewMissing or uncertain? Hold.
→04 / AUTHORIZED ACTIONA reviewable next stepWithin the practice’s agreed permissions
SOURCE-LINKED HUMAN-CONTROLLED
Built for specialty clinicsAlongside your existing systemsSupervised by your people
THE PATIENT-TO-PAYMENT JOURNEYConnect the work before care
01 / BEFORE A PROCEDURE 02 / AFTER AN ENCOUNTER 03 / THROUGH PAYMENT
Connect the work before care
to the work after it.
Connect care to the claim.
Review documented services, diagnosis and procedure-code candidates, modifiers and units. Evidence-linked drafts for qualified staff review.
Follow the full picture.
Rejections, denials, claim status and remittance reconciliation are planned expansion, subject to access, validation and agreed responsibilities.
Every engagement starts with a defined workflow. Actions and release authority are agreed before live operation.
THE SYSTEM AROUND THE AIEVIDENCE RULES ACCOUNTABILITY Explore the engineering approach →
Reliable workflows take more than a model.
Every proposal has a source.
Keep the relevant documentation and rule behind a proposed decision visible to the reviewer.
Logic you can trace.
Identify the rule, source and date used. Explicit checks constrain model-assisted interpretation.
Uncertainty becomes work.
Missing evidence and unresolved decisions go to a qualified person or stop before action.
A FOCUSED FOUNDATIONBuilt on real workflows.
Built on real workflows.
Evaluated on unseen cases.
4,000+historical cardiovascular claims analyzed
Historical cases informed the workflow and safeguards. Selected coding tasks were evaluated separately on held-out cases.
Retrospective, task-specific evidence. Not complete-claim accuracy, authorization success or demonstrated revenue uplift.
Explore the evaluation →WORK WITH WHAT YOU HAVEKeep your systems.
Keep your systems.
Add a more accountable workflow.
Your EHR, staff and billing systems stay in place during initial validation.
Supported interfaces, FHIR and permitted browser workflows are assessed practice by practice. Read, draft, write and release permissions are separate decisions.
Review integrations & safeguards →CARDIOVASCULAR RCM
Specialty depth. Shared discipline.
Explore procedure readiness, documentation and evaluated coding components for cardiovascular practices.
Explore cardiovascular RCM →PARTNERSHIPProve value first.
Prove value first.
Align incentives with verified gains.
Start with one workflow, establish an adjusted baseline and measure quality, staff effort and financial impact.
Our proposed performance fee is an agreed share of verified incremental net cash collections. All commercial terms are agreed separately.
See the pilot & commercial model →COMMON QUESTIONS
A clear place to start.
Do we need to replace our EHR?
No replacement is proposed. Connectivity and permissions are assessed for your actual EHR, practice-management system, payer portals and clearinghouse.
Who approves consequential actions?
Authorized staff retain clinical judgment, physician sign-off and consequential submission authority during the initial pilot.
What do the evaluation percentages mean?
Agreement on specific retrospective coding tasks, with explicit denominators. They do not measure whole-claim accuracy, authorization success or revenue uplift.
How would the performance fee work?
The proposed fee is an agreed share of verified incremental net cash collections above an adjusted baseline. Scope, share, setup charges, caps and measurement terms remain negotiable.
A measured beginningChoose one workflow.
Choose one workflow.
Establish the evidence. Measure the result.
Start with your practice’s real bottleneck and a clearly defined pilot.
Request a workflow assessment →